近 50% 的受访者乐于使用一个或多个 CSS-in-JS 库,可以肯定地说 它们开辟了一种新的编写样式的方式。也许前端世界中的 CSS 和 JS 两个方面 并没有离得那么远?
链接到某一部分满意度 对比 使用率
图表
数据
This chart shows each technology's satisfaction ratio (or interest ratio) over its total user count. It can be divided into four quadrants:
ASSESS: Low usage, high satisfaction. Technologies worth keeping an eye on.
ADOPT: High usage, high satisfaction. Safe technologies to adopt.
AVOID: Low usage, low satisfaction. Technologies probably best avoided currently.
ANALYZE: High usage, low satisfaction. Reassess these technologies if you're currently using them.
预/后处理 | |
CSS 框架 | |
CSS-in-JS |
链接到某一部分技术使用基数
图表
数据
对于每一部分, 受访者对前几种技术的使用率 (此处的"使用"定义为"会再次使用")。
预/后处理
∑71.8%
131.4%
231.4%
最常见的答案
37.5%
41.5%
50.0%
CSS 框架
∑53.7%
126.8%
最常见的答案
215.2%
36.9%
42.9%
51.2%
60.5%
70.1%
80.1%
90.0%
100.0%
110.0%
120.0%
CSS-in-JS
∑47.8%
120.6%
最常见的答案
212.5%
38.1%
43.9%
51.8%
60.5%
70.3%
80.1%
90.0%
100.0%
110.0%
120.0%
130.0%
140.0%