跳到内容

技术

近 50% 的受访者乐于使用一个或多个 CSS-in-JS 库,可以肯定地说 它们开辟了一种新的编写样式的方式。也许前端世界中的 CSS 和 JS 两个方面 并没有离得那么远?

满意度 对比 使用率

This chart shows each technology's satisfaction ratio (or interest ratio) over its total user count. It can be divided into four quadrants:

  • ASSESS: Low usage, high satisfaction. Technologies worth keeping an eye on.

  • ADOPT: High usage, high satisfaction. Safe technologies to adopt.

  • AVOID: Low usage, low satisfaction. Technologies probably best avoided currently.

  • ANALYZE: High usage, low satisfaction. Reassess these technologies if you're currently using them.

预/后处理
CSS 框架
CSS-in-JS

技术使用基数

对于每一部分, 受访者对前几种技术的使用率 (此处的"使用"定义为"会再次使用")。

预/后处理

71.8%
1
31.4%
2
最常见的答案
31.4%
3
7.5%
4
1.5%
5
0.0%

CSS 框架

53.7%
1
最常见的答案
26.8%
2
15.2%
3
6.9%
4
2.9%
5
1.2%
6
0.5%
7
0.1%
8
0.1%
9
0.0%
10
0.0%
11
0.0%
12
0.0%

CSS-in-JS

47.8%
1
最常见的答案
20.6%
2
12.5%
3
8.1%
4
3.9%
5
1.8%
6
0.5%
7
0.3%
8
0.1%
9
0.0%
10
0.0%
11
0.0%
12
0.0%
13
0.0%
14
0.0%